{"id":2360,"date":"2019-11-27T16:32:40","date_gmt":"2019-11-27T15:32:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fairfood.org\/?p=2360"},"modified":"2023-02-14T10:53:11","modified_gmt":"2023-02-14T09:53:11","slug":"how-blockchain-can-help-smallholder-farmers-build-up-a-self-sovereign-digital-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fairfood.org\/en\/resources\/how-blockchain-can-help-smallholder-farmers-build-up-a-self-sovereign-digital-identity\/","title":{"rendered":"How Blockchain can help smallholder farmers: build up a self-sovereign digital identity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
At Fairfood, we identified nine ways<\/a> in which blockchain can help smallholder farmers. In a new blog series we will dive into these nine topics, looking at interesting use cases, reports and visionairs. In this first post: how blockchain can help smallholder farmers build up a self-sovereign digital identity.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Internet connectivity is on the rise! Omnipresent internet access through mobile phones will no longer be reserved for developed countries only. As a result, currently there are many technical solutions in development that aim to bring basic services to disconnected smallholder farmers. In fact, according to the report Digitalisation of African agriculture by CTA<\/a>, there are at least 390 distinct, active solutions in Africa alone that help digitalise smallholder farmers; 60 percent of such solutions were launched in the last three years. In total, they have already registered over 33 million smallholder farmers as users on their platforms, which is over 13 percent of all smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No formal identity This is why it is such an important issue today that an estimated 1.1 billion people in the world<\/a> still has no formally recognised form of identity; almost 1 out of every 5 people is cut off from accessing basic services and rights. It is an issue set for the world to address in the SDG\u2019s \u2013 goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions. A sub goal is goal 16.9, on identity: \u201cBy 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.\u201d A goal for which technology can play a pivotal role in achieving it, bringing financial and social inclusion to families worldwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The risks of a government issued identity One such example is Syria. A 2015 study of the Norwegian Refugee Council<\/a> into the case of Syrian refugees confirmed that \u201cthe majority of Syrian refugees \u2013 70 per cent \u2013 do not have their national ID card\u201d. According to those interviewed, their documentation has been lost, destroyed or confiscated. \u201cThe absence of these documents prevents the registration of subsequent vital events such as marriage, divorce, birth and death and creates a huge barrier for obtaining legal residency in the country of exile\u201d. In some cases, replacement of this documentation is impossible, for example due to the destruction of civil registries inside Syria. As a result, refugees might be at risk of becoming stateless.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A self-sovereign digital identity In today\u2019s world, the average internet user has over 92 online accounts<\/a>. As we become increasingly connected, our digital identities are more and more embedded in everything we do online. Every day we go through many of the same authentication processes that proof that we are who we say we are. We use logins, biometrics such as facial recognition and fingerprint scans to access services and carry out interactions. All these online interactions over time create digital trails or histories of our personal data and behaviour online: our financial, tax, purchase, legal, medical and credit histories, among others. In a way, the sum of our interactions online builds up our digital identity, which is now almost becoming more important than our government issued identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are therefore already increasingly becoming less dependent on governments to identify ourselves. On top of that, there is a growing awareness among identity experts of the importance of ownership and control over identity, leading them to shift their focus increasingly towards a \u201cuser centric\u201d or \u201cself-sovereign\u201d ID. The World Economic Forum, USAID, the World Bank, GSMA and others all covered the topic in their publications. In contrast to centralised systems where institutions provide ID credentials, self-sovereign IDs are built to empower individuals to control the formalisation of their identity<\/a>.This would allow users to manage distinct digital personas and to actively monetise their personal data (we will cover the topic of data monetisation more in an upcoming blog post.)<\/p>\n\n\n\nToday, an estimated 1.1 billion people still has no formally recognised form of identity<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>In a previous blogpost<\/a>, we already described how digitisation can help smallholder farmers overcome daily challenges. Many of these solutions make use of new technologies like blockchain to help smallholder farmers get access to services that were previously not readily available to them, such as loans, insurances, farm management and productivity apps. However, in order to get access to any type of financial service, or any service that relates to trust, farmers need to be able to identify themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>In 2017, in partnership with GSMA<\/a> (the largest association that represents interests of mobile network operators worldwide) and others, the World Bank agreed on a set of principles related to identification systems<\/a>. Among those was the principle of universality, which advocates that countries should fulfil their obligations to provide legal identification to all residents \u2013 not just citizens \u2013 from birth to death. This seems like the most obvious solution for the widespread problem of lack of legal identity for marginalised people, as government agencies still hold an essential role in providing legal identification. Centralised governmental identity systems do, however, inherently carry some risk.<\/a> They \u2018lock\u2019 individuals to a single authority with the power to potentially deny them their identity, hold documents for ransom, or even confirm a false identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn a way, the sum of our interactions online builds up our digital identity, which is now almost becoming more important than our government issued identity.<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>So, why should we be dependent on governments for identifying ourselves when they pose a single point of failure to our identity and have failed to properly identify 1.1 billion people globally?<\/p>\n\n\n\n