{"id":8970,"date":"2021-01-13T18:24:04","date_gmt":"2021-01-13T17:24:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/resources\/\/resources\/fairfood.nl\/resources\/?p=8970"},"modified":"2023-02-14T11:54:05","modified_gmt":"2023-02-14T10:54:05","slug":"why-we-need-lawmakers-and-why-we-need-them-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fairfood.org\/en\/resources\/why-we-need-lawmakers-and-why-we-need-them-now\/","title":{"rendered":"Why we need lawmakers, and why we need them now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Time is not our friend. Although by now we pretty well know what we have to change to make this world a better place, we keep postponing true action and passing on the responsibility. Time for governments to step in: we need lawmakers, and we need them now.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Although most of us are heavily dependent on our daily cup of coffee, growing it is getting harder without many of us understanding why. In 2019, the coffee price crisis confronted the world with the industry\u2019s vulnerability. An enormous surplus in Brazil, the global leader in production, led coffee farmers all over the world to break. Prices plummeted as consumption continued to rise, generating an unfair competition from which small farmers in low- and middle-income countries still struggle to cover the effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n With few regulations in place, scientists point that another crisis is imminent. Climate change is affecting conditions in Southern countries in charge of producing, reducing the places that can sustain these crops, threatening whole families of coffee farmers. A recent study<\/a> estimates that by 2050, the amount of land that can sustain coffee will have fallen by 50 percent, and at the same time, demand is expected to increase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Why are we talking coffee? Because it is just one example of a crop where we are failing to make a positive, much-needed change. Do we shift our focus to the agri-food sector as a whole, we can clearly see that inequalities are still intrinsic to our food today. In 2020, nearly 50 million people were victim of modern slavery<\/a>, and around 150 million children were working illegally<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Surprisingly, best practice to tackle such problems often means staying ahead<\/em> of the regulatory curve. Leading CSR companies are those adopting a principled and harmonised approach towards issues such as living wage<\/strong>, privacy rights<\/strong>, cybersecurity<\/strong> and child labour<\/strong>, among many other basic rights ignored by regulation. Meanwhile, the absence of rules obligating businesses to address human rights risks within their supply chains, allows them to comply with the bare minimum. In the UK, for example, the Modern Slavery Act<\/a> requires companies to report on any steps taken to prevent forced labour in their supply chains, but it does not require companies to take any action when confronted with that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n After adopting a similar approach through the Dutch Child Labour Due Diligence Law<\/a> in 2017, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation announced in 2020 it would join efforts with the EU Commission, that committed to introducing legislation for international corporate social responsibility at EU level, as part of Ursula von der Leyen’s (president of the EU Commission) plan of working towards “a Europe that takes the lead on the major challenges of our time”. The idea of having a continental approach to more sustainable supply chains and due diligence is promising, but the policy proposal can also be seen as a way of transferring the responsibility<\/a> of protecting human rights of countries’ own supply chains to Europe. Brussels, after all, has a lot on its plate, and aligning the different goals and interests from different European countries can take time. So far, two consultations<\/a> were made available by the Commission, and civil society can participate until February 8. we need lawmakers<\/p>\n\n\n\n While policy-makers and the average company refuse to make the commitment a priority, the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 widens the chasm for the commodity-producing developing countries. Heavily affected economically, they once again rely on alliances and partnering to recover. And, ironically, the pandemic served to remind us what good leadership looks like. Decision-makers were able to literally save lives when managing the crisis in a firm and human-centered way, while the lack of action guided only by economic values led to more inequalities. What is then missing for leaders to address the humanitarian crisis that is endemic to our food system? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n High-income countries are not only failing to achieve their own goals, but their unsustainable supply chains and trade-related spillovers are undermining other countries\u2019 capacities to achieve their own as well. To ensure international legitimacy, the EU must not only track, but find ways to address negative international spillovers through liability provisions. This will require coherent trade and external policies through the Green Deal and Human Rights Diplomacy, strengthened tax cooperation and transparency, the application of EU standards to exports, and curbing trade in waste. Lack of tangible progress should require governments to step in with regulation and enforcement to ensure a safe and trustworthy system that leaves no one behind. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThere\u2019s a new reality for CEOs today: employees, customers and investors alike expect business leaders to go beyond rhetoric and take meaningful action on climate change”, defended<\/a> the President of the Environmental Defense Fund, Fred Krupp. Elsewhere<\/a>, he added made a case for corporate lobbying: “CEOs need to unleash the most powerful tool they have to fight climate change: their political influence. Corporate voices matter to Congress, but the vast majority of businesses have been silent on the need for climate policy, or even opposed to it.” In order to make sustainability a real commitment, the entrepreneur is part of a group of entrepreneurs advocating for a law that sets clear rules for businesses, claiming<\/a> that only governments can ensure the needed level of collective actions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n As self-regulations largely failed small farmers, common rules and standards can level the playing field. Trade-policy terms must not only encourage, but ensure companies to tackle violation of human rights and environment in their value chains. In our current situation, it means having corporations committed equally, and most important, proportionally, to the Sustainable Development Goals. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The absence of legal standards which define companies\u2019 duties and ensure access to justice for victims of corporate malpractice has produced serious accountability gaps. Such urgent situations cannot be hanging on discussion level, while the ones in charge of our food perish, together with our planet and natural resources. Climate change is no longer an IPCC forecast, but a reality affecting food-producers and a series of different nature-based businesses today. Legislation is the only way to speed up this process. Measures around contracts that can be offered to workers, for example, or restrictions on the amount of pollution certain industrial processes are allowed to produce. It’s about fair and open competition: taking responsibility and being held accountable for both the positive and the negative impacts, shifting the paradigm to one based on short-term results to long-term build on value chains.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\nThe paradox of regulation <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
An ugly truth<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Taking responsibility<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Levelling the playing field<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Want to stay ahead of legislation?<\/h2>\n